2 officers involved in Breonna Taylor death could be fired after department probe

2 officers involved in Breonna Taylor death could be fired after department probe


The Associated Press

Posted December 29, 2020 9:02 pm


Updated December 29, 2020 10:30 pm

Breonna Taylor case: New video, documents released

Breonna Taylor case: New video, documents released – Oct 8, 2020

  • comments

    Leave a comment

  • whatsapp

    Share this item via WhatsApp

  • more

    Share this item

  • more

    Share this item

Smaller font
Descrease article font size

Larger font
Increase article font size

  • Share this item via WhatsApp


  • Share this item on Pinterest


  • Share this item on LinkedIn


  • Share this item on Reddit


  • Copy article link

    Copy link

Louisville police have taken steps that could result in the firing of two officers connected to Breonna Taylor’s death — the one who sought the no-knock search warrant that led detectives to her apartment and another found to have opened fire.

Detective Joshua Jaynes received a pretermination letter, media outlets reported Tuesday. It came after a Professional Standards Unit investigation found he had violated department procedures for preparation of a search warrant and truthfulness, his attorney said.

Detective Myles Cosgrove also received a pretermination letter, media outlets later reported, citing his attorney, Jarrod Beck. Kentucky’s attorney general has said it was Cosgrove who appeared to have fired the fatal shot at Taylor, according to ballistics tests.

Read more:
Officers involved in Breonna Taylor case got ‘slap on the wrist’: third grand juror

The shooting death of the 26-year-old Black woman in her home sparked months of protests in Louisville alongside national protests over racial injustice and police misconduct.

Story continues below advertisement

Jaynes has a hearing with interim Chief Yvette Gentry and her staff on Thursday.

“Detective Jaynes and I will show up for the pretermination hearing to try to convince acting Chief Gentry that this action is unwarranted,” attorney Thomas Clay told the Courier Journal. “Jaynes did nothing wrong.”

Trending Stories

  • Remembering the celebrities we lost in 2020

  • Trump campaign files lawsuit with Supreme Court to overturn Wisconsin election results

Jaynes was not present during the shooting at Taylor’s apartment in Louisville. About 12 hours earlier, he secured a warrant with a “no-knock” clause from a judge.

Judge rules in favour of allowing grand jurors in Breonna Taylor case to speak out

Judge rules in favour of allowing grand jurors in Breonna Taylor case to speak out – Oct 20, 2020

In Jaynes’ pretermination letter, Gentry said, the officer committed “extreme violations of our policies, which endangered others.”

“Your actions have brought discredit upon yourself and the department,” she wrote. “Your conduct has severely damaged the image our department has established within our community.”

Officers were serving a narcotics warrant on March 13 when they shot Taylor, but no drugs or cash were found in her home. Taylor was an emergency medical worker who had settled in for the night when police busted through her door.

Story continues below advertisement

Former officer Brett Hankison was charged by a grand jury with wanton endangerment, a low-level felony, for firing into an adjacent apartment where people were present. The two officers who shot Taylor, according to ballistics evidence, were not charged by the grand jury. One of those officers was shot by Taylor’s boyfriend during the raid and returned fire. Taylor’s boyfriend said he thought an intruder was breaking into her apartment.

© 2020 The Canadian Press

Leave a comment


Black Lives MatterPolice ShootingPolice brutalityBreonna TaylorLouisvilleBreonna Taylor deathbreonna taylor caselouisville policeBreonna Taylor officersno knock warrant

Leave a comment


More from Global News

  • Britain becomes 1st country to approve Oxford-AstraZeneca coronavirus vaccine

  • Chinese developer says coronavirus vaccine 79% effective, lower than earlier data


Tagged , , ,

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *